Prep Monday—What You Need or What You Want?


I’ve been struggling with this for the last few weeks—at least—and I’ve come to a few conclusions. Very few, I might say. But here’s my advice:

You CAN do everything you need to do on a homestead by hand, toiling 12 or more hours a day, just like our ancestors. Who died at age 50.

Or, you can make things easier on yourself without relying too heavily on power and technology.

Of course, the third option is still there—spend money, go into debt, buy all the latest gear—but when SHTF, you might be in a world of hurt.

I mentioned before that someone was surprised that we weren’t planning on regressing into the Dark Ages just yet, and honestly, it would take a very strong and skillful individual to make that decision at this time. I doubt if I’m either.

Think about some of those reality TV shows—yes, I know, but these are the folks who actually do live out in the middle of nowhere, and support themselves by living off the land. Fascinating. I’d tell you the title, but I don’t remember . . . go figure. Rather, go Google . . .

But they were raised that way, or transformed themselves over a period of years or decades. Just out of curiosity, a social experiment as it were, I’d like to know how long the average person could make a move out into the woods and stay there, hermit-like, before having to run to town for something. In a gas-powered vehicle.

But you always have choices. You just have to make smart decisions. And hope that you’re right.

For example:

Do you need a tractor? Maybe. Could you garden and/or farm without one? Of course. You could use a tiller, a horse-drawn plow, or a shovel to break ground. If you’re planning on feeding your family for a year with that garden, or perhaps selling surplus produce for an income, you’re going to need at least an acre. That’s roughly 43,560 square feet, or a 209-foot square.

That’s a lot of shovel work, or tilling, or, if you go the plow route, that’s also feeding and housing a horse.

So, if you’re buying a tractor, what else could you use it for? We’re looking at road grading, moving stuff, brush hogging, knocking stuff down, dragging, and so forth.

Huge expense, yes; multiple uses, also yes.

What do you buy? I’m certainly not going into tractor details, but you want sufficient horsepower and PTO to do the jobs you’ll need it to do, and in a newer tractor, a 3-point hitch to make implement-changing easier.

Buy the best you can afford, while paying cash.

Debt-free is certainly the best way to go, particularly now. You might think that when SHTF, all credit bureaus and creditors will magically disappear, but I don’t think it’s going to happen that way. I do think that those bloodsuckers will hang until the very end, and they’re going to get nasty on collections.

I know, I know. You thought they were already like that . . .

Unless the Big Event is complete immolation of everything, in which case you’ll be dead anyway.

New or used? Doesn’t matter. Buy the best you can afford to pay cash for—tractor, car, truck, communication devices, weapons. All of it.

And then learn how to do it all by hand, without power, without assistance from anyone but your family or group, with whomever you’ve chosen to face SHTF.

 

 

 

Fan Friday—Shootings


I was out and about yesterday and happened to check Facebook mid-afternoon, when I saw a post about the Oregon college shooting. There wasn’t much online at that point, but stories trickled in over the rest of the day.

Horrific, yes. Very sad, yes. But the damn gun didn’t fire itself. The crazy dude did it. How did he get a gun? I don’t know. Could someone else, with a gun, have taken him out before he could kill people? I don’t know that either; sometimes, as we see on the news, that happens. I tend to think many who carry would be just as terrified as someone who didn’t, and that, of course, would limit their actions.

But it’s pretty obvious that having a “gun-free zone” doesn’t work very well. Bad guys work around the rules, that’s why they’re called “bad” guys. You go into a bank, you don’t try to rob the place because you’re not a “bad” guy; he’ll go in the bank and try to rob it anyway.

Not like he went to a gun store and bought a gun, although maybe he did. There are loopholes; mistakes are made. Many crimes here in STL, however, are committed with stolen firearms.

That’s ‘cause we have bad guys, everywhere.

I know all the arguments; we’ve all heard them, over and over. I’m okay with hearing a fresh take on an issue, but I’m not okay with skewing statistics to prove a point as in several articles I’ve read recently.

Fact: Killing innocent people is wrong.

I think we can all agree with that.

But for a country in which many citizens believe it’s okay to murder a baby in the womb, why are we surprised when someone thinks it’s okay to shoot people?

Those who believe in abortion don’t think that that a fetus is actually a human being—or, they think the baby’s rights are less than that of the mother, the mother who chose to have sex (please, spare me the stats on rape victims and pregnancy or even failed birth control; the old saying “there’s an exception for every rule” applies across the board).

Look, most people think that sex is great—people think a lot of things are great, but that doesn’t mean we have a “right” to do those things. Even if we do, for every action, in any situation, there’s a consequence:

Get drunk, risk having an accident;

Steal something, risk arrest;

Have sex, you could get pregnant.

All of these things are your choice. THAT is your choice, and your choice extends to fixing the “problem,” but only if it doesn’t infringe on another’s rights.

If you get drunk and have an accident, you pay fines, repairs, living with guilt, possibly prison time. You might be able to alleviate those consequences, but the point is that YOU are paying for your choice. Steal and face arrest, same things apply.

For those who believe abortion is wrong, that it’s killing another human being, the consequence you may face for having sex is pregnancy and parenthood.

For those who think abortion is a good solution, you have a “procedure” and that’s it, one and done. In effect, you have no consequence. But that’s not how things should work, right?

I mean, if you believe it’s okay to kill an innocent child, why are you so adamant that we do away with guns because sometimes someone opens fire on innocent students or bystanders or anyone else?