Writer Wednesday—Amazon


Okay, fine, I’ll write about the latest from Amazon. So there.

The great dispute between Amazon and Hachette seems to be over E-book pricing, right? Here’s my opinion:

Who cares?

Oh, I’m sure Hachette authors care—it’s their livelihood, after all. And Hachette cares, because they also make money off E-book sales. And Amazon cares because . . . why?

I’m guessing because there are SO MANY lower-priced books on the Amazon site. But surely, you ask, aren’t people buying books from Hachette authors, even at those high prices? Yes, yes they are.

Let’s look at this from the perspective of indie authors and even small press:

We’ll start with a typical fiction E-book, roughly 80K words or so. A Hachette book (and I’m using them because, really, that’s who this is about) is priced at $14.99—that same book, in paperback, is roughly the same price. Should it be? Probably not. An electronic book is not a physical object, but in this day and age, well, maybe. Blood, sweat, tears have gone into its production, its writing, regardless of the medium a reader chooses.

Now look at an indie book, same size, same blood, sweat, and tears. That book is priced at, on average, $3.99. Why? Because that’s a price point at which it will sell. Look up the statistics. Again, why? Because that seems to be what readers are willing to pay for a book by Joe Blow, versus one written by a nationally known bestselling author.

Come on, don’t you go to the dollar store sometimes for certain products? Don’t you comparison shop? Don’t you sometimes get suspicious because something is priced too cheaply, and you think, therefore, that it might be crap? Be honest.

Now, you can find all over the web where someone quotes figures as to how many MORE Hachette books would sell at a lower price, and I stink at math so I’m not going to get into all that. Doesn’t matter. In fact, I’m almost tempted to raise my E-book prices, just to see what would happen. Hmm. Not a bad idea.

Times are tough for everyone, even people who read for entertainment. The fact remains that, for every Hachette E-book purchased, a reader could buy 3-4 indie books, right?

So why does Amazon care?

Beats me.

Look at your average physical bookstore. They sometimes have sales, discounts, specials, etc. They are under no obligation to do so, they can usually set their own price for the books they sell. If a book retails for 14.95, the store can sell it for as little as they want, technically. It depends on how much money they’ll make off each sale—that’s what effects their decisions.

Amazon is an online bookstore, right? (Yes, yes, among other things.) So why can’t they sell at whatever price they want? They don’t discount RHP E-books, but they DO discount our paperbacks.

I think the dispute comes down to royalties and contracts.

Many E-book publishers pay 40-50% royalties on E-books—on the retail price. Does Hachette do that? I don’t know. Maybe they pay on net. See, as indie authors know, you have to price your E-book above a certain rate in order to collect that 70% royalty, minus, of course, the cost of delivery. Amazon earns 30% of each book, without any costs. So, to make it simple, if your book is priced at $4.00, you earn $2.80 on a sale, minus a few cents. Amazon earns $1.20, for giving you the means in which to sell your book.

If you have a small press handling your book, or an E-publisher, same figures, you would earn $1.60 to $2.00 per E-book sold.

Now a Hachette book, priced at $15.00, would earn $10.50 for the publisher; Amazon’s cut is $4.50. The author would earn $6.00 or $7.50, depending on royalty percentage. That’s a big difference: on average, $2.20 versus $6.00 or $2.40 compared to $7.50. No wonder Hachette authors want a higher-priced book—don’t you?

But what is Amazon’s deal? They could make $1.20 or they could bring in $4.50 per book. Seems like a no-brainer. Why penalize a big money-maker?

And then. Gee, says Amazon, let’s take it to the readers. And authors. OF COURSE readers want cheaper books. Duh.

And you know what? Authors want more money. Another duh. So now, I’m thinking, a lot of indies are saying, “Hey, maybe our books should cost MORE!” What’s Amazon going to do then? Refuse to carry E-books at all? Aren’t they cutting their own throats over this whole thing? If Hachette lowers prices, Amazon makes a lot less.

What’s their game, anyway?

 

 

 

Writer Wednesday—Dear Mr. Patterson:


Dear Mr. Patterson:

I’ve had about enough of you. I used to be a fan. I suppose someday I’ll re-read many of your books, but right now I’m just a little pissy.

First, I found out that you don’t actually WRITE most of “your” books, yet you rake in millions of dollars a year. That’s kind of a slap in the face to almost every other author, isn’t it?

Is that why you feel the need to comment on the book industry and stick your face into every book or publishing controversy? Do you think anyone cares what you think? What makes you qualified—reminds me of celebrities running off at the mouth about politics; they believe everyone should listen to them for some obscure reason.

Second, last year when all the hoopla was about you personally donating to struggling bookstores, I signed up for “updates” and even threw our bookstore into the ring.

Crickets.

Yep, that’s what I got. No updates, no responses—not even to a message I sent you, essentially agreeing with your full-page ad. Oh, and no grant. Had to close OUR bookstore, one of the ones you’re so concerned about.

And now this. Your publisher is having a slap-fight with Amazon and so you speak up yet again.

According to the USA Today article that I just read, you said “the future of our literature is in danger.” Then you added that “Amazon wants to control book buying, book selling and even book publishing,” and you mentioned a monopoly.

Well, bless your heart—where have you been? Of course Amazon wants a monopoly! That’s old news, just ask a bookseller. I just can’t help thinking you might have stayed quiet on the publishing part, except it involves Hachette.

But guess what? Amazon does stuff like this to a lot of publishers—particularly small press. Heck, just last week they listed one of RHP’s books as “children, ages 0-17.” It was a murder mystery. With sex and violence. Ha.

Sometimes it takes a week or more to have our books listed on Amazon. Often the cover pics are missing for days. We don’t usually get to put our books up there for pre-orders, and even when our books ARE available, Amazon adds things like “only one copy remaining” and “will take two weeks to ship.”

Sound familiar?

Now, let’s talk about your comment about “the future of our literature.” My, doesn’t that sound elitist? Do you write “literature?” I must have missed that one. I guess you meant reading material, specifically books, right? I mean, well . . . never mind. That’s not my point.

What I THINK you meant is that big authors and publishers are in danger from the [gasp] Amazon monopoly, and that their sales will suffer. Of course, you may also have meant that there will be a dearth of quality reading material for consumers, if Amazon is allowed to continue on its merry way.

Let me tell you something, Mr. Patterson: NOT ALL GOOD BOOKS COME FROM NEW YORK. There are a lot of small press, and yes, indie and self-published authors who can tell a good story. Their books might be the high-gloss, widely marketing, absolutely perfect copy that you and your minions churn out, but readers can forgive some of that if the story is good.

Not everyone gets lucky, like you did—there, I said it. Luck. Like getting a job without experience, authors can’t often get a top-notch agent without having a considerable track record. I have no doubt, in the beginning, you worked your tail off—but I know a hundred authors who work just as hard as you did and probably write just as well, if not better.

Maybe you should mingle with the common folk for a bit. In fact, come on out to St. Louis and I’ll introduce you around to all the talented folks here that yes, DEPEND on Amazon to get their work in front of an audience.

But fair warning, I’m still ticked off about the bookstore grants . . .